Bo leashed-up with Austin. |
I checked Austin and he was 123 -- an in target range number. Austin had insulin on board that was working on breakfast carbs he had recently consumed. Given this information, it would appear Bo's alert was false as opposed to being ahead of the meter. However, two hours earlier Austin had been playing in a basketball game. We know exercise has a delayed effect on blood sugar, so it was possible that his blood sugar was trending down. Like we always do when Bo alerts outside his reward thresholds, we told him were were going to watch. Austin leashed back up with Bo and I took a seat on the couch next to them. Twelve minutes after his first alert, Bo broke place and came to me on the couch to alert. This time Austin was 87. I rewarded Bo, gave Austin a 17 g (uncovered) snack had Austin leash-up again with Bo before I went back upstairs.
I've learned it's important to watch false alerts to determine if they are in fact false or if they are ahead of the meter. Our criteria for qualifying an alert as being ahead of the meter is a blood sugar in reward range within 15 minutes or less from the time of the original alert that was out of reward range. Typically, Bo re-alerts within 10 mins of his first alert when he is ahead of the meter.
Do you have a process for watching false alerts? What does your process look like? What are your criteria for determining if an alert is false or ahead of the meter?
We had a similar situation yesterday. Ranger alerted, Hayden was 151. We gave the watch command. 10 minutes later he alerted again and Hayden was 187 and trending upward rapidly. We corrected and Ranger relaxed. I think the hardest part is the waiting during the "watch". Ranger has learned persistance!
ReplyDelete